HC sets aside IIMA’s decision of dropping doctoral student
- Parliament LIVE: Expert committee to review use of pellet guns, says Rajnath
- Dalit fury spills over to Gujarat streets, 9 more try to end lives; CM meets family assaulted in Una
- Hit by campus protests, FTII makes new students sign ‘decorum, decency’ affidavit
- Dalits are 'soft target' for cow vigilantes: fact finding team
- Suspicious bag found inside Dubai-Amritsar SpiceJet flight
The Gujarat High Court Tuesday set aside the decision of Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (IIMA) of removing a doctoral student from its Fellow Programme in Management (FPM) and directed the institute to promote the student.
Last year, IIMA had decided to remove G V Radhakrishnan, a retired naval officer, from the course in which he enrolled himself for research in Public Systems Group (PSG). Since he had an MBA degree he was permitted to join second year directly. However, his progress was to be evaluated for promoting him to the next years courses.
According to Mukul Sinha, counsel for Radhakrishan, in June 2012, an order was passed by the institute directing him to withdraw from the FPM course. Radhakrishnan appealed to the director as well as chairman of FPM executive committee responsible for evaluation.
In the petition, Radhakrishnan argued that the committee while evaluating violated the FPM regulations since the committee didn't have the required number of votes. While challenging the institute's decision, Radhakrishnan had informed the court that there should be minimum one-third of total voting members of the committee which has 90 members. However, in this case, the decision of his removal was taken by only 19 members.
Justice S R Brahmbhatt passed an order allowing the petition and directing IIMA to promote Radhakrishnan to the third year.
Sinha said, "Normally, the court doesn't interfere with the decisions of academic bodies but in this case the violation of regulations for evaluation had been contravened. The court held that at IIMA, the process of evaluation is to be done under the 11.2 of the FPM regulations and though the regulation may not have statutory flavour, yet it was necessary to follow the regulation scrupulously for all students."
- UN faces a crisis, but its new secretary general is unlikely to upset tradition
- South China Sea verdict has changed the ground rules for future engagement with China
- Empowering women through JAM
- Resolution of citizen grievances is an indicator of the performance of government departments
- Telescope: Grace and the lack of it
- The endeavour for a common civil law must be to end discrimination, and not stamp majority might