Higher royalty, dull results take sheen off Hindustan Unilever
- Rajnath Singh does a Sonia Gandhi, meets top Shia clerics in Lucknow
- Gandhi vs Gandhi: Priyanka slams Varun, says LS poll not a family tea party
- Supreme Court grants recognition to transgenders as third category of sex
- SC rejects Kejriwal's plea to stay trial in defamation case filed by Kapil Sibal's son
- Modi equates Rahul with kids, says âtoffeeâ has caught his fancy after âballoonâ
Consumer goods company Hindustan Unilever (HUL) said on Tuesday it had agreed to enter into a revised royalty deal with Unilever on technology, services and trademark licences provided by its Anglo-Dutch parent.
The new agreement will increase royalty costs, in a phased manner, to 3.15 per cent of total sales by March 2018, from the current 1.4 per cent of turnover for HUL. The increase in royalty cost in the period from February 1, 2013, to March 31, 2014, is expected to be 0.5 per cent of turnover, and thereafter in a range of 0.3-0.7 per cent of total sales in each financial year, HUL said.
The announcement, together with a disappointing set of numbers for the December 2012 quarter, pushed the HUL scrip down more than 6 per cent on the BSE.
HUL reported a 15.5 per cent increase in net profit at Rs 871.36 crore for the third quarter ended December 31, 2012 as compared to Rs 753.81 crore during the corresponding quarter previous fiscal.
The maker of Knorr soups and Lux soap said the company's net sales rose to Rs 6,433.69 crore in the third quarter as against Rs 5,844 crore during the same period in previous fiscal.
During the quarter, the company's domestic consumer business grew at 15 per cent with underlying volume growth of 5 per cent, which analysts said was the lowest in the last three years.
In December 2009, the government through Press Note 8, freed up caps for payments for foreign technology collaborations and royalty fees under the automatic route, including lump sum payments for transfer of technology, payments for the use of trademark and brand name. Foreign sponsors who earlier required government approval for charging royalty under the various heads were now free to charge any amount as royalty to their Indian subsidiaries.
- Modi wave is a myth, says Siddaramaiah
- In Mandya, discordant notes in show of Cong unity
- ‘Fakir’ Jankar takes on Pawar might in battle against ‘dynasty’
- Ballot paper in Braille to help blind persons cast their vote
- AAP volunteer attacked
- 64-year-old fights for Punjabi language, gets little support from political parties