House passes new anti-ponzi scheme Bill, gives more teeth to courts

Raghuram RajanRBI Governor Raghuram Rajan (right) and deputy Governor K C Chakrbarty, in Kolkata Thursday. (IE: Subham Dutta)

The new West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013 was passed in the state Assembly Thursday, after withdrawing the earlier one following objections from the Centre.

The Bill was moved in the House by the state Finance Minister Amit Mitra incorporating some clauses as suggested by the union Finance Ministry.

The Ministry had raised objections and had sought clarifications from the Trinamool Congress-led state government on the earlier Bill.

Clarifications were sought on widening the powers of special designated courts dealing with cases related to chit funds and that no court could grant anticipatory bail. The new Bill was passed incorporating fresh provisions like attachment of property in case of default in payment of deposit and transfer of property.

Leader of Opposition in the Assembly Surya Kanta Mishra strongly criticised the fresh Bill describing it as an equally non-transparent one and said the withdrawal of the previous Bill was unconstitutional.

Mishra feared the new Bill would also fail to get a Presidential assent and said the move was an attempt by the government to protect the culprits involved in the ponzi scam.

He also demanded a CBI probe under the supervision of the Supreme Court and raised questions on giving compensation from the public exchequer.

Mitra, however, said the Justice Shyamal Kumar Sen Commission was set up following directives of the Calcutta High Court.

A similar Bill, introduced by the previous Left Fron government in 2003, did not get a Presidential nod.

The Left Front government did not withdraw the Bill when it was returned in 2006, but chose to introduce another legislation on the similar subject in 2008, which was subsequently passed in the House.

The TMC government decided to repeal the Bill passed by the LF government, which had not received the President's nod.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus