How FDI Bill linked to one on quota in promotions


Sometime in the course of the past few noisy days in Parliament, senior Congress leader Karan Singh quietly conveyed his decision to step down from the Rajya Sabha Ethics Committee. His resignation letter, ending his eight-year stint, stated that it should be considered effective only from December 1. None of this would be that significant had it not been for the fact that Mulayam Singh Yadav's brother Ram Gopal Yadav is tipped to take over from Singh on December 2.

For starters, the SP leader would get a big room in Parliament. But more importantly, it would lend some stature to the party's overall profile. At least that is what the Congress hopes as it looks to broker a way out of the imbroglio over the Bill on SC/ST reservations in promotions in the Rajya Sabha. Believe it or not, resolving this issue in the Upper House holds key to ending the stalemate over FDI in retail in the Lok Sabha.

The SP is learnt to have conveyed to the Congress that it cannot count on its vote or it abstaining in case of a debate under Rule 184 on FDI in the LS if the Bill on reservations is passed in the RS. The BSP is on the other side of the divide, except that it has neither conveyed a threat nor given a firm assurance of support. Chances are that if a debate were to happen on the Bill, the BSP will side on FDI in retail with the Congress.

The SP should ideally not have a problem with allowing a discussion on the reservations Bill because it seeks a constitutional amendment, which requires a formidable two-thirds majority to be cleared. However, the SP feels that on this issue no party will want to be seen opposing the Bill on the floor of the House and hence, letting a discussion happen could be a risky affair.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus