How they short changed a tall pacer

Among the more enduring pictures of the 2007-2008 Australia Test series, there is one that was captured at the Mumbai airport just before the Indian team's departure. In the said photo, a smiling Anil Kumble is flanked by a baby-faced Ishant Sharma and a gleaming Pankaj Singh, the captain's hands (and though not on the picture but hopes, too) resting on the young duo's shoulders. Standing between the towering six-foot-five duo, Kumble, despite his 6'1 frame, looks oddly stunted in fact, anything but jumbo.

The significance of this shot was how, in the absence of their first-choice pacers, the injured Munaf Patel and S Sreesanth, India had decided to gamble on these two tall but greenhorn bowlers, hoping to hold their own against the Australians, if not quite physically intimidate them.

Sure enough, the nippy Ishant justified his selection by starring in a memorable win at Perth, but Pankaj, who bowled under 130kmph, played just a tour game, took two wickets, and was soon forgotten.

And five years on, he remains forgotten. It's a bit harsh on the now 27-year-old, that despite being the most consistent domestic medium-pacer in this period, he's not even where he was in 2007 in the selectors' peripheral vision.

His name rarely crops up in selection committee meetings these days, not even as a back-up option. What seems to have happened is that his biggest asset, his frame, which saw him getting fast-tracked into the team is now being held against him. They think he doesn't bowl at a pace corresponding to his size, as he said in an interview to cricinfo recently.

He has taken 150 wickets in four seasons, but unfortunately the 150 that matters is the one calculated in kmph. Pankaj has improved his pace, which is in mid-130s now, but it's not what will make you sit up and take notice.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus