Husband cannot contest ex-parte order for maintenance payment
- Kashmir: 3 militants dead after attack at army camp in Handwara, medicines with Pak marking recovered
- The whitewash: Probe alleges Rohith Vemula's mother faked Dalit status, blames him for his suicide
- BCCI refute allegations of non-compliance with Lodha panel in Supreme Court
- Jayalalithaa's health: Madras HC dismisses petition, says filed for publicity, political reasons
- Government study finds toxins in PET bottles of 5 soft drink brands
The Madras High Court Bench has ruled that a husband cannot contest the ex-parte order for payment of maintenance for his estranged wife and children after the lapse of the limitation period.
Justice G Rajasuria passed the order while dismissing a civil revision petition filed by a man, challenging refusal of a lower Court at Dindigul to condone the 2,741 day delay in filing a petition to set aside its Jul 19,2010 ex-parte order to pay Rs 2000 a month to his wife and minor daughter.
The man claimed that he was unaware of the order as he was in Kerala to eke out a living and that the lower court had not given him an opportunity to get the order set aside. His wife and girl child claimed they were living in penury as he had not paid them anything even after court order.
Justice Rajasuria agreed with the lower court decision to dismiss the petition for condoning the delay of over 2,000 days in challenging a court order.
- Revealing Elena Ferrante’s identity violates her desire for privacy
- Breakdown of LoC ceasefire will make it difficult for army to control infiltration
- Academic publishers suit shows how much they benefitted from intellectual commons
- Lack of unity has prevented Sindhi nationalists from pressuring Islamabad
- India must be prepared to deal with a disease that is growing globally
- Challenge for India’s leaders is to show that strength can be blended with subtlety & deftness