Idea, Airtel linked to fate of Vodafone Gujarat dispute

The fate of the tax dispute around Vodafone Essar Gujarat's demerger of telecom towers to a separate entity for infrastructure sharing with other service providers is set to have tax implications for its partners Idea Cellular and Bharti Airtel too but not necessarily for all companies that transfer towers to a separate company, say experts.

The tax department has objected to Vodafone's demerger of towers to Vodafone Essar Infrastructure contending it is the first step in an alleged tax avoidance arrangement prior to this entity's amalgamation into Indus Towers, which also holds the towers of Bharti and Idea for common use. Tower sharing is encouraged by the government to keep costs low for making cellular telephony available in rural areas. Vodafone, Bharti and Idea own Indus in the ratio of 42:42:16.

The tax department's claim that the scheme was meant to evade R3,500 crore of income tax and other state-level levies including R600-crore stamp duty, was first endorsed by a company law judge but was overturned by the Gujarat High Court in favour of Vodafone. The tax authority's appeal is now being heard in the Supreme Court. Experts said that usually, any court order in a tax matter will apply only to the taxpayer concerned for the years specified, but any decision by the Supreme Court favouring the tax department, would have wider implications.

"The apex court's ruling becomes the law of the land and it would, in principle, apply to any tax payer in identical facts and circumstances. However, for the income tax department to make a tax demand, it will have to initiate separate proceedings," said Neeru Ahuja, partner, Deloitte.

When contacted, a spokesperson for Bharti Airtel declined to comment on the issue that is sub-judice. Idea Cellular could not immediately respond to a query emailed on Thursday. Idea Cellular got Gujarat High court's approval for demerging towers to Idea Cellular Towers Infrastructure in August 2009. Ernst & Young tax partner Pranav Satya said the apex court decision could impact other companies too depending on the way the judgment is passed.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus