In her own write

J.K. Rowling's use of a pseudonym shows literature is still divided into gendered domains

Readers of The Cuckoo's Calling, a detective novel, might have imagined Richard Galbraith as a crusty old army veteran who could spin a good yarn. Published this February, the book had received glowing reviews. Would Galbraith's sleuth have been as "complex and compelling" if critics had known that the real author was J.K. Rowling? Last year, the author's first Muggle book, The Casual Vacancy, had been published to universal disdain. Galbraith had an unfair advantage over Rowling; not being known as one of the best-selling authors of all time must help in managing expectations. But it is worrying that the Currer Bell phenomenon persists in the literary world of the 21st century.

When Jane Eyre, by a "Currer Bell", was published in 1847, it was instantly popular. But as speculation grew that Currer Bell was actually a woman, the language and sentiments of the novel suddenly appeared "coarse". Critic G.H. Lewes advised Bell, or rather, Charlotte Bronte, to write more temperately, following in the measured footsteps of Austen. It was common for 19th-century female novelists to write under male pseudonyms — George Eliot and George Sand, among others. Those who did not were expected to maintain a certain feminine propriety. Some of these prejudices followed women authors into the 20th century, especially in crime writing. P.D. James, for instance, prefers clipped, gender-neutral initials. Female crime writers may be allowed to write cosies, such as those of Agatha Christie and Ngaio Marsh, but the grittier stuff was more believable when it came from men, publishing choices seemed to suggest.

Certain literary genres continue to be gendered domains. But women authors are not the only ones who suffer from this absurd gendering of literature. Some of the steamiest romance novels have been penned by men, writing under female pseudonyms. Her Vampire Husband by Richard Galbraith might not have done so well.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus