In Mamata Banerjee's WB, HC asks why not impose more taxes to hold fair polls
- Congress Vadodara candidate Madhusudan Mistry arrested for vandalising Modi posters
- Modi wants EC to take action against Sonia, says Cong chief resorting to 'rabid communalism'
- Shakti Mills gangrape convicts repeat offenders, says court; may face death sentence
- Sahara must pay Rs 10,000 cr to show its 'bonafide' and not for Subrata Roy's release: SC
- Sri Lanka vs West Indies Live Cricket Score: Sri Lanka lose three in a hurry
The Calcutta High Court today asked the Mamata Banerjee-led West Bengal government why it should not impose taxes for holding free, fair and peaceful elections in the state if it was suffering from a funds crunch.
"Why are taxes not imposed for holding elections if it has a funds crunch?" Justice Biswanath Somadder asked state Advocate General Bimal Chatterjee while hearing a petition by the State Election Commission against the state government over holding of the panchayat elections.
"Every day in the newspapers there is talk of new taxes, so why not taxes for holding elections?" Justice Somadder asked and directed the state to come up with a reply at a later date.
Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had yesterday announced imposition of new taxes to set up a Rs 500 crore relief fund for investors allegedly duped by the Saradha group.
When the AG submitted that it was common knowledge that the state had a resource crunch, Justice Somadder observed "if the resource or lack of resource can hinder holding of free, fair and peaceful elections, why not impose taxes on citizens as it is in their interest that free and fair elections are held."
Countering SEC counsel Samaraditya Pal's submission that 800 companies of central paramilitary forces were necessary for holding the panchayat elections in a free, fair and peaceful manner, Chatterjee stated "The state election commission should have taken into account the ground realities while asking for 800 companies of armed forces."
Asking why the SEC was seeking 800 companies and not more or less, the AG submitted that in correspondence with the state, the SEC could not give justification for the demand, but stuck to the figure of 800 companies claiming primacy.
He also submitted that the state government had already provided Rs 100 crore of the Rs 209 crore asked by the SEC for holding the panchayat elections in the state.
- Real science is in small laboratories: Prof Rao
- Unguarded and unkempt, vacant govt houses cry for attention
- Won’t become a politician, will carry forward husband legacy: Savita Bhatti
- Congress screening panel okays Bansal’s name for Lok Sabha ticket
- Gujarat minister Saurabh Patel may reply to EC notice: ‘I’m related to Ambanis’
- SC exonerates BJP leader Bokhiria in businessman murder case