India's n-trade dilemma: US power rate twice that of Russia
- SC stays Teesta Setalvad's arrest till Friday
- Arvind Kejriwal meets PM Modi, raises issue of statehood
- We moved from politics of agitation to politics of hope, says Yogendra Yadav
- After Modi's rap, BJP workers shelve NaMo temple project in Rajkot
- Nitish parades his numbers, Bihar Governor calls Manjhi for floor test
The high cost of power from US nuclear reactors India has proposed to buy is proving to be the biggest hurdle to pursuing nuclear trade negotiations with Washington, with the upper price limit calculated by the Department of Atomic Energy being almost twice the price finalised with Russia for Kudankulam units 3 and 4.
Based on the talks so far, the upper limit calculation — essentially the maximum price per megawatt before negotiations — is Rs 38.76 crore per MW, which works to Rs 12.19 per KWH for the consumer. This, sources said, is way higher than the recently negotiated price with Russia, which is about Rs 22 crore per MW, translating to about Rs 6 per KWH for the consumer.
Even though the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd is yet to begin price negotiations, there were concerns over signing a preliminary agreement without getting a clearer picture on how far the prices could be reduced.
The exchange value is pegged at Rs 67 to a dollar as of now for the purpose of this agreement, which has been moved as a Cabinet note and would be taken up by the Cabinet Committee on Security soon.
One of the reasons for the cost being so high is India's civil nuclear liability law and its requirements, which has raised insurance costs for all nuclear power firms doing business with India. American companies are being overcautious to ensure that they do not lose out due to some litigation as has happened to some US firms.
As a result, the preliminary agreement, which is worth just Rs 102 crore, leaves out reference to any contentious issues. In fact, the DAE has made it clear that the agreement will lead to no nuclear activity and more importantly, has emphasised that liability issues will only be dealt in the main contract.