ISI says linking us in case smear attempt

Pakistan's ISI agency has claimed that it had "absolutely no role" in the 2008 Mumbai attacks and attempts to link the organisation and its ex-chiefs to the incident were a "crude smear attempt", a media report said on Monday.

A lawsuit filed in a New York court by relatives of two Jewish victims of the Mumbai attacks was "against the alleged perpetrators and masterminds, that is, Hafiz Saeed, Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and others", sources in the ISI were quoted as saying by The News.

Sources claimed that the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) had no role in the attacks and the inclusion of the names of former ISI chiefs Nadeem Taj and Ahmed Shuja Pasha was "only done to smear the agency and get it declared a terrorist organisation".

"There is no rocket science involved in the issue. The ISI and its (directors general) have had no role whatsoever in the Mumbai incident as regularly reported by the Indian media," a source was quoted as saying.

Sources in ISI appreciated the role of the US in "sorting out the issue" related to its former chiefs. "We are glad that the US government prudently supported the claim of the Pakistan government. It is a US decision that we admire and appreciate," a source said. There is "no need to fabricate cock and bull stories on the subject", the sources claimed.

The US State Department recently informed a New York court hearing the lawsuit that the ISI and two of its former chiefs "enjoy immunity" and cannot be tried for the Mumbai attacks. "The Department of State has determined that defendants Ahmed Shuja Pasha and Nadeem Taj are immune from suit in this case," an official letter said.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus