It's official! Tiger count in Sundarbans between 64 and 90


Amid a dispute over Tiger count in Sundarbans, a fresh survey has found that the largest habitat of the Royal Bengal Tiger has a population between 64 and 90.

The 2004 census had claimed that the tiger population in Indian Sundarban was around 274 and the figure dropped to an estimated 70 in the 2010 census, prompting experts to cast doubts on its accuracy as they claimed that scientific methods were not used for the head count.

The figure was put at 90-odd by certain agencies involved in the census in the world's largest mangrove forest six months ago but the new survey puts the tiger population between 64-90.

"Population estimation of the Sundarbans tigers was done with a combination of camera trapping and satellite telemetry. The total population for the Indian Sundarbans was estimated to be between 64 to 90 tigers," says the latest Environment Ministry document.

According to the new document, a tiger density of 4.3 tigers per 100 sq km has been estimated at the Sundarbans Tiger Reserve and its surrounding areas.

The All India Tiger Estimation Exercise for 2010 had revealed that the tiger population in the country has risen to 1,706 compared to 1,411 in 2006.

The total area of the Sunderbans is 9,630 sq km out of which 4,264 sq km bears mangrove forest. The area of the Reserve is 2,585 sq km covering land area of 1,600 sq km and water body over 985 sq km.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus