Keeping it real
- Bihar: School director dies after mob assault over death of two students
- PM spoke about Rakhi, but neglected Muslims during 'Ramzan': Congress
- Watch video: CCTV captures Mumbai local ramming into station
- Another Vyapam scam accused dies; 24th death in the case
- Sushma's Ministry declines info under RTI on Lalit Modi's passport issue
News must be free of the distortions of money, as well as the eagerness to please the audience
The Zee News editors caught on camera allegedly trying to cut a deal of Rs 100 crore in advertising from industrialist-politician Naveen Jindal's company and promising, in return, not to air damaging stories, are now being investigated. There are unanswered questions on both sides, but Jindal has alleged extortion and criminal conspiracy, while Zee has appealed to public sympathy and support from its peers, even invoking the Emergency. This is not a question of media freedom, however, or a prompt for us to ponder greater regulation. It is an allegation of a criminal act. Extortion — in this case, yet to be established — is met with serious legal consequences, whether committed by an individual or on behalf of a group.
In the UK, after the phone-hacking scandal foregrounded entrenched tabloid malpractices and the collusion between the media and politics, Lord Leveson's inquiry into "the culture, practices and ethics of the press" has recommended strengthening and insulating a press complaints body, while stopping short of statutory regulation. In India, we are certainly not at that juncture. In the absence of explicit First-Amendment-style protection for media freedom, we rely on the courts' expansive reading of Article 19(a), as part of a citizen's fundamental right to free speech and expression. Deriving legitimacy and protection from such an unwritten social contract means the media must hold up its end with sincerity and responsibility.