'Kill Honey Singh by not listening to his songs'
- We condemn the flogging of Dalit men in Gujarat, says Rajnath Singh
- India cannot suppress voice of Kashmiris, should hold plebiscite: Nawaz Sharif
- Hockey legend Mohammed Shahid passes away
- Ambiguity on Navjot Singh Sidhu's status in BJP as no official word on resignation from party
- 7th Pay Commission: Govt to examine pay parity between IAS, non-IAS officers
"If you find Honey Singh offensive, kill him by not listening to his songs," remarked a speaker during a session on freedom of speech at the Jaipur Literature Festival today.
Participating in the session, journalist Shoma Chaudhury touched upon the recent controversy over rapper Singh and his music, saying no one should be stopped from doing any form of culture and art performance.
"If you find Honey Singh offensive then boycott him. Kill him by not listening to his music. But you can't ban him," Chaudhury, managing editor of Tehelka magazine, said.
Singh was the centre of a controversy when many groups ran a campaign against him over alleged offensive lyrics of his songs.
Chaudhury said India needs to become a more liberal society.
"We need to become a more liberal society and defend the liberty. The only narrow restriction we must have should be on incitement of violence and discrimination through speech," she said.
"We need to throw open the article 19(2) of our Constitution which restricts our speech...There is no exception to freedom of speech...except for cases which can incite violence we should have no curb," she added.
Most of the panelists and the audience expressed that the country lacks freedom of expression when panel moderator John Kampfner asked them to vote on whether they think India has too much freedom of expression, India has less freedom of expression and that freedom of expression is adequate.
"Raise your hand to whatever option you think is right," Kampfner, who is adviser to Google on freedom of expression and culture, said. To this, majority of the audience raised their hands when it was called that India has less freedom of expression.
Few also raised their hands for the option that India has enough freedom.
The panelists also comprised historian Orlando Figes, John Kampfner, author Basharat Peer and novelist John Burnside.
- The endeavour for a common civil law must be to end discrimination, and not stamp majority might
- A host of powerful open and programmable capabilities is set to create the ‘WhatsApp moment’ for Indian banking
- Local newspapers are often the only source of news during curfew and the record of state violence
- Navjot Sidhu’s revolt has complicated the Punjab pre-poll scene
- There is an urgent need for India to reclaim 'national interest' from its national media
- India's institutionalised monetary policy framework has to be taken to its logical conclusion