Unconstitutional to hang convicts in Rajiv Gandhi case now: Former Judge

Rajiv Gandhi

Over 13 years after confirming the death sentence of three accused in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination as head of a Supreme Court Bench, former judge K T Thomas today said it would be "constitutionally incorrect" to hang them as the convicts have spent 22 years in jail without a "review" of their case.

"We have not considered the nature and character of the accused who were sentenced to death penalty in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case, and so death sentence is against Article 22 of the constitution," Justice Thomas, who headed the three-judge bench, told PTI. "It will be constitutionally incorrect to hang them very late," he said. In 2010, the apex court bench headed by Justice S B Sinha in the Bariyar case had observed that while passing the death sentence, the personal character of the criminal should be taken into consideration, Justice Thomas said. Moreover, the three death row convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case Murugan, Santhan and Perarivalan have been in prison for over two decades, the former apex court judge added.

For any life imprisonment, every prisoner is entitled to have a right to get his case reviewed, whether remission can be announced or not, he said. Since the three were death row convicts, they underwent a long period of imprisonment without getting the chance to have a "review" of their case, Thomas said.

Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by a woman suicide bomber on May 21, 1991, at Sriperumbudur. A designated court had in 1998 imposed death penalty on 26 persons but when the case reached the Supreme Court, capital punishment was confirmed only for four -- Nalini,

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus