Liability clause stalls deal on 2 new n-reactors in Kudankulam
- SC quashes decision to include Jats in OBC category, rules caste can't be sole ground
- Day after results, Omar, Amit Shah and Ram Madhav met to explore J&K tie-up
- Neither Sonia nor Rahul ever filled such forms: Congress
- Nun gangrape case: 10 detained, Centre seeks report from WB govt
- To push land law forward, govt set to pause House
The hopes of firming up the commercial agreement for two more nuclear reactors from Russia during Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's visit have suffered a setback with the Russian side wanting its legal team to take another look at the liability obligations in the agreed documents.
As a result, senior government sources said, an agreement was not on the cards for Monday, as no such step could be taken till lawyers on both sides give a green signal to the document.
But the government tried to downplay the issue, with sources projecting it as a "last-minute hurdle". They claimed all issues had been settled, an "agreed text" reached, and what was being done now was to go in for another round of vetting by the lawyers as the liability aspect was being dealt with for the first time in a commercial memorandum.
As a signal of growing cooperation between both countries in this field, the first reactor in Kudankulam is planned to be linked to the grid in the next 24 hours, just around the time Singh meets Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The initial objective was to couple this with the announcement of two more reactors at the same site, but despite a strong push, the provision on the right to recourse in India's Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Act remained the biggest concern.
The Indian side had suggested a way out by involving the General Insurance Corporation and getting it to work with the Department of Atomic Energy to come up with a rate chart of sorts along with a set time-frame for every supplier product.
The aim was to add predictability and monetise the risk so that suppliers could know how much to cater for as liability costs, an issue which the Russian side had also raised at some point. In the run-up to the visit, both sides had exchanged formulations on how to reflect this in the agreement, but clearly Moscow is still concerned about the implications.