- Malaysia signals missing plane carrying 239 including 5 Indians has crashed
- Disquiet in BJP as M M Joshi, Sushma raise questions over selected candidates and seat sharing
- Subrata Roy arrest row: The not-so-beautiful story
- Vajpayee wanted Modi to quit over Gujarat riots, but party said no: Venkaiah Naidu
- Rest in freeze: Is Ashutosh Maharaj 40-day âclinically deadâ or a guru in a very long meditation?
The report, which crowd-sourced solutions and got 80,000 responses, and was the collective effort of many young lawyers along with Justice Leila Seth and Gopal Subramanium, is a worthy, if broad, compendium of problems and solutions. It covers most aspects of sexual violence, the damaging idea of "honour", institutional biases and the way women from disadvantaged backgrounds are doubly vulnerable, the assault they often face in zones of conflict. It rightly stresses that harsh punishment like castration would fix the problem only in our fantasies, and that the focus should be on responsive administration, the implementation of existing laws and citizen action. Many of the points it flags have long been demands, including police reform, extending the law to marital rape, to homosexuals and transgenders, a clear medical protocol for rape cases. The report, to its credit, sticks its neck out by arguing that no AFSPA exemption should apply to sexual violence. Some other proposals tread a trickier ground. It recommends that all MPs facing criminal charges step down, that a constitutional authority be appointed to monitor gender justice goals. It offers a progressive analysis of the problem but falters on some of the specifics, and could have benefited from hewing closer to its brief.