Malad, Malwani, Kandivali tense over Facebook post on Prophet
- Kerala DGP says he had objected to visits of PM Modi, Rahul during rescue-relief work in Kollam
- Delhi odd-even phase 2: Kejriwal govt's second tryst with reducing air pollution
- UPA-I tried to dismiss Mulayam govt in 2007: Bhardwaj
- India slams UN 'hidden veto' in sanctioning terrorists
- Handwara killings: Girl, father in custody, kin demand release
Tension prevailed in Malad, Malwani and Kandivali on Tuesday night and Wednesday after a Kandivali (West) shopkeeper lodged a police complaint against derogatory remarks on Prophet Mohammed on social-networking site Facebook.
As news traveled, residents of Muslim-dominated localities demanded arrest of those behind the post. A mob of 200-300 staged a rasta roko near Jama Masjid at Malwani in Malad (West) Wednesday afternoon. Police said the protest began at 3 pm and went on for an hour.
Malad and Charkop residents also gathered in large numbers outside the police stations in the areas to lodge complaints. They also forced shops to shut down.
Malwani, Malad and Kandivali police were pressed into service to calm the protestors. By Wednesday evening, the situation was under control.
"We told the protestors Kandivali Police had registered a case and applied appropriate sections. They were also told the case had been transferred to the cyber crime branch, which calmed them," said an officer from Malwani police station.
Nazimuddin Rafiq Ahmed Khan, an iron dealer who stays at Laljipada in Kandivali (West), was sitting with his friend Ayub who was checking his mail and Facebook account.
"Ayub was going through his Facebook account when he came across the post on the profile of a Jaipur resident by a fake user and 'liked' by others. After reading the abusive and perverted words, I went to police and lodged a complaint," said Khan.
Kandivali police officers said they registered a complaint under sections 295 (a) (hurting religious sentiments), 153 (a) (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc) and under IT Act sections 66 (a) (sending offensive or false messages) and 67 (publishing information which is obscene).
- On IPL, to accuse the court of a politics of distraction is to miss the point
- Lok Sabha should create consultative mechanism for speaker to certify a money bill
- Why doubling farmers’ income by 2022 is possible
- Diary item: When it’s better to be loved and lost
- Not just reservations, Dalits also want respect, participation, prosperity and empowerment
- Why the PM’s paeans to Ambedkar ring a little hollow