Man seeks punishment for Tata, Hind Motors
- By taking my passport or arresting me, they are not getting any money: Mallya
- BJP MP Swamy challenges expunging of his comments in Rajya Sabha
- Gujarat announces 10 per cent EBC quota, will apply to all whose annual family income is Rs 6 lakh or less
- Cabinet, BJP rejig around May 19 when state results come in
- Middleman left country day after CBI opened probe, trail leads to doors of Cong bigwigs: Minister Prasad
After failing to comply with the orders of the state commission for consumer disputes redressal, the complainant has moved the court stating that Tata Motors and Hind motors should be liable for punishment under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act.
In May 21, 2010, Manmohal Lal Sarin had bought a faulty Tata Nano car and after many repair attempts by the company failed to meet the satisfaction of the complainant.
A petition was then moved to the consumer disputes redressal commission stating that orders passed by the forum on July 6, 2012 have not been complied to.
The complainant said the firm was supposed to pay a sum of Rs 35,000 and repair the car. However, on November 7, 2011 the complainants received a draft of Rs 35, 000 dated August, validity of which had expired. The draft was from M/s Banarsi Dass Automobiles Limited, Panchkula, who were not a party in the case.
- India comes across as trying to compete with China by being China
- Why a book on India is seen to be unbuyable in Islamabad
- Why is the BJP pushing itself so aggressively to appropriate Ambedkar now
- The immortality of Don Quixote
- Patenting software is no more a part of Digital India than is patenting arithmetic
- India’s jobless growth is undermining its ability to reap the demographic dividend