Manesar red alert
- CBI sought part RTI exemption, Govt gave it full
- Screen Awards: Milkha, Ram-Leela and Madras Cafe dominate
- DGCA seeks fresh public objections after clearing AirAsia for take-off
- Delhi: 51-year-old Danish national alleges gangrape, 15 detained for questioning
- I wonder if I will be able to ever reunite with my husband, my kids. I miss them: Devyani
Savage attack on managers at Maruti plant highlights need for urgent reform of archaic labour laws
The khap panchayat is no longer the only institution Haryana needs to be urgently concerned about. The state, which projects itself as an attractive investment destination, is fast acquiring a reputation for violent labour unrest. There have been at least five outbreaks in recent years, the most significant being the strike at Hero Honda in 2005. Last week, there was a savage attack on managers at Maruti's Manesar plant, with one senior manager brutally beaten up and left to die in a flaming office. Now, with Maruti's scrip sliding in response to the incident, foreign investors may be wary about sinking their money into a state offering insufficient protection.
But violent labour unrest is not just Haryana's problem. It must be addressed nationally. India has developed a strong trade union movement but it has insufficient legal safeguards against unreasonable and militant trade union activity, which is harming the formal sector and discouraging investment. Within two decades of Independence, agitations had severely damaged Maharashtra's textiles industry, and wiped out heavy industries and jute mills in West Bengal. This is because labour laws had excessively valorised labour's right to employment over the entrepreneur's right to security, both personal and fiscal. Today, almost 200 Central and state laws impinge on labour relations and markets — including the archaic Industrial Disputes Act of 1947.