Marks altered during data entry: Cops
- Dadri: Outrage after mob lynches man for allegedly consuming beef
- At United Nations, Pak PM Sharif plays his old tune on Kashmir
- 2006 Mumbai train blasts: Death sentence for 5 convicts, life for 7
- Modi's foreign visits need to be backed up with action on ground: Rajan
- Diesel rates up by 50 paise from midnight tonight, no change in petrol price
Re-evaluation 'scam': 'Role of evaluators not ruled out'; 3 suspended clerks yet to be traced
The police team probing the alleged re-evaluation scam in the University of Pune (UoP) have found that the fraudulent changes in the marksheets of students were made at the data entry level by the suspects involved in the case. The police, however, have not ruled out involvement of answersheet evaluators in the alleged malpractice.
In December 2012, the UoP administration had lodged a criminal offence against three clerks who were allegedly involved in increasing students' marks during the re-evaluation process of examination papers in lieu of money. The 'scam' came to light for the first time in October 2012 when the Cantonment police investigating dummy students' racket stumbled upon the alleged irregularities in the re-evaluation process.
The university had set up a three-member fact-finding committee which, in its report, named three examination department clerks — Ashok Ranawade, Ramesh Shelar and Chetan Parbhane — who were suspended.
"Our investigations so far have made it clear that the fraudulent changes were made at the time of entering the data of marks obtained by the students into the system after the answersheets were re-checked. However, at this stage we cannot rule out the possibility of involvement of evaluators in the malpractices. We are yet to arrest the three suspects in the case. Once that happens, their interrogation will throw further light on the modus operandi of those involved in the alleged scam."
Sharad Awasthi, a retired assistant commissioner of police (ACP) who headed the three member fact-finding committee, said: "Though the purview of our committee was limited, the inquiry conducted by us also pointed towards the same. It's apparent that the marks were increased while they were being entered into the system. This was the reason our committee had recommended that the IT system at the examination department be strengthened and human intervention is kept to the minimum."