Misconstruction of court order by Haryana, a white lie: Legal experts
- Independence Day Narendra Modi speech LIVE: PM addresses price rise to progress
- Narendra Modi speech Independence Day 2016: Transparency seems to be highlight, says processes simplified
- CRPF officer killed as militants attack police station in Srinagar
- Rio Olympics 2016: Dipa Karmakar's Produnova does India proud
- Narendra Modi’s Independence Day speech packs a few subtle hints after the hard messages
Legal experts have termed the Haryana government's justification, that senior IAS officer Ashok Khemka has been transferred in compliance with Punjab and Haryana High Court orders, as nothing but a "white lie" and "wilful mis-construction" of the court order.
A bare perusal of the October 1 order, makes it evident that the Court only gave Haryana an opportunity to remove an "anomaly", which the state itself had created by giving Khemka dual charge as special collector, a post that should have been held by a very junior-level officer. Further, the entire dispute and the court order pertains only to the post of special collector and not that of Director General, Land records and Consolidation of Holdings, which was Khemka's principal charge.
" Haryana government's plea that Khemka was transferred pursuant to the High Court's order of October 1 is a white lie. To justify Khemka's transfer, Haryana resorted to wilful misconstruction of the High Court order. He was transferred because the government smelled his intention to probe the Vadra-DLF land deal. It was a pre-emptive transfer, which failed to achieve its purpose because Khemka ordered the probe and cancelled the mutation undeterred,"says noted lawyer Anupam Gupta.
Talking to The Indian Express , Gupta, a senior advocate, added: "The High Court order relates to the additional charge of special collector held by Khemka. It has absolutely no bearing on his principal charge of Director General, Consolidation of Holdings, which is a much higher office than that of a collector. An officer, who is of Commissioner rank, cannot be assigned the duties of a collector, especially when the collector's decisions are appealable to the Commissioner. Any argument to the contrary would be a travesty of law as well as common sense. The High Court commended Khemka's objection to the additional charge as reasonable. The state government has stood reason on its head."
- Indians are more free than when the British left, but less free than what the framers of our Constitution hoped us to be.
- Gujarat Dalits’ move to quit ‘menial jobs’ in protest has a precedent in UP
- Ravana in Uttar Pradesh: Nayanjot Lahiri
- PM Modi needs to move from slogans to action to transform agriculture
- Nepal: The politician-activist-donor nexus dominates the appointment of judges
- To his successor, and to the PM and the government, Dr Rajan has left valuable messages