Monster Beverage Corp changes label to qualify as 'drink'
- Tanzanian student was not stripped, paraded naked: K'taka Home Minister
- National Herald case: Sonia, Rahul Gandhi move SC challenging Delhi HC order
- Budget session of Parliament to begin on Feb 23; Jaitley hopeful of GST
- Suspended UP chief engineer Yadav Singh arrested, Congress, BJP say probe links
- Will stand by Pakistan if it acts on terror: Rajnath Singh
Monster Beverage Corp. is changing the labeling on its cans so that its energy drinks will no longer be considered dietary supplements, a move that changes the federal guidelines the drinks must follow.
Monster's CEO told the industry tracker Beverage Digest that the cans will now list "Nutrition Facts'' rather than "Supplement Facts,'' as well as disclosing caffeine content.
The change reflects the intensifying scrutiny energy drinks have come under over the past year, with lawmakers calling on the Food and Drug Administration to look into the safety of the caffeine levels and other ingredients used in the drinks. It also highlights the confusion consumers may encounter when it comes to the labeling of energy drinks, with companies having the discretion to categorize them as either dietary supplements or traditional drinks.
While Monster is currently categorized as a dietary supplement, for example, the No. 2 energy drink Red Bull is categorized as a traditional beverage.
Generally speaking, companies have more leeway in the ingredients they can add to dietary supplements. With products considered to be food or drinks, companies can only use ingredients that are approved food additives or that are ``generally recognized as safe,'' said Elizabeth Campbell, a senior adviser at EAS Consulting Group, which specializes in FDA regulatory matters.
Among the issues lawmakers have raised over energy drinks is that they sometimes contain little-known ingredients, such as the taurine used in some Monster drinks. A spokesman for Monster Beverage was not able to confirm the report in Beverage Digest or whether the Corona, California, company would remove any ingredients as a result of any possible labeling changes.
Meanwhile, the FDA is still working on final rules for what qualifies as a beverage versus a dietary supplement. But the agency had issued guidance in 2009 noting that dietary supplements were being marketed in ways that suggested they were regular drinks. It also noted that products that use terms such as "drink'', "juice'' and "beverage'' suggest they're conventional foods, rather than supplements.
- Outcome on Section 377 will depend on composition of the Constitution bench
- Inadequate staff, payment delays undermine MGNREGA in drought-hit Mahabubnagar
- ICDS, the primary scheme targeting malnutrition, needs to be broadened
- Rohith's death must focus attention on the rites of exclusion in the university
- Telescope: State in the bedroom
- The economy is best served by lowering interest rates and blocking protectionism