Namdhari ‘admits’ shot Hardeep, charged with attempt to murder
- Alleged mastermind behind Sabarmati Express burning case arrested by Gujarat ATS
- Malegaon case shows Hindutva forces are succeeding in widening Hindu-Muslim divide, writes Julio Ribeiro
- After Nehru, Rajasthan now axes RTI Act from textbook
- Pathankot airbase attack: ‘Handler’ Latif pushed back to Pak after ’93 Hazratbal siege, was deported in 2010
- Elections in five states: Fate of 8,300 candidates to be known tomorrow
One of the accused arrested earlier reportedly disclosed Namdhari's "involvement" in the shootout.
Seeking Namdhari's custody, the police told court that 26 criminal cases had been lodged against him in Uttarakhand between 1993 and 2009, eight of them being of murder, and that he had been accused of threatening people. They had received several requests to cancel his firearms licence, the police said.
Opposing the five-day remand sought by the police, Namdhari's counsel R S Mallik pointed out that it was Namdhari who had lodged an FIR in the case and had also rushed Ponty to hospital.
"How can he be a conspirator considering that the other FIR lodged in the case by Hardeep's driver Nand Lal does not show his involvement?" Mallik said, adding that the arrest itself was illegal.
According to the counsel, Namdhari was only accompanying Ponty to his farmhouse, and that the younger brother had opened fire, forcing his PSOs to fire back at Hardeep in self-defence.
Nand Lal, in his FIR, had not mentioned anything about the shootout and even about Namdhari's presence at the time of the alleged criminal trespassing, Mallik said. He had only identified three persons, who are already in police custody.
Earlier, the liquor baron's four guards — Bhupender, Rajpal, Uday and Anand — were remanded in police custody till November 25 for allegedly entering the disputed farmhouse in South Delhi and thrashing Hardeep's men.
- Burying Karkare: I cannot let these forces go unchallenged
- Maoists’ use of IEDs reveals the true nature of their project
- Supreme Court’s judgment on criminal defamation is the latest illustration of a syndrome
- In the battle for academic freedom
- Modi government has rightly given the highest priority to reviving agriculture
- Should the citizen say ‘Bharat Mata ki Jai’, or not, is not the question