National Security Agency defends surveillance programme
- FIR against Giriraj Singh for Modi-Pak remark, BJP pulls him up
- Modi attacks Gandhis again, wonders how Rahul can lead country when he can't handle Amethi
- Malaysian Airlines flight to Bangalore makes air turnback, lands safely
- Vote for BSP to keep fascist forces, dynasty rule at bay: Mayawati to Muslims
- IPL 7: Maxwell, Miller lead KXIP to stunning win
America's secretive National Security Agency has defended its surveillance of cellphones globally, arguing that this is legally authorised under a sweeping US presidential order and such programmes have been used in some of the most dangerous parts of the world.
"This collection does not violate FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act)," NSA spokeswoman Vanee Vines said in a statement.
It comes days after a Washington Post report said that NSA is collecting every day about five billion records on the whereabouts of cellphones around the world which includes both US and non-US citizens.
"It is not ubiquitous. NSA does not know and cannot track the location of every cell phone," she said. "This capability has been used in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, including war zones, where terrorists are actively
planning to do harm to the nation," Vines said.
Without directly referring to The Washington Post story, the NSA official said this tracking is solely about foreign communication and does not involve tracking domestic cell phone.
"NSA tries to avoid the acquisition of US person communications during EO 12333 operations and also uses collection methodologies to comply with the restrictions in FISA," the official said.
Vines said the collection of the global cellphone location data is carried out under the White House order that governs all US espionage, known as Executive Order 12333.
"If EO 12333 collection results in the incidental acquisition of a communication to, from, or about a US person, we apply minimisation procedures and, depending on the specific circumstances, may also be required to destroy the record and report the incident to NSA's overseers," she said.
Arguing this particular NSA programme is outward-facing, Vines said the the agency doesn't intentionally acquire domestic information through this capability.
"FISA authorisation would be required for the intentional collection of domestic metadata. This activity is centred on overseas locations," she said.
- Arrests in priest murder case divide Catholic Church
- Short Change: EPFO to allot permanent account number to active subscribers by Oct 15
- India Inc profit set to grow, but margins under pressure
- Mulayam: Will amend Constitution for Muslim quota
- ‘Start political revolution by defeating Rahul, Modi’
- Count of Monte Carlo: Wawrinka tames master, becomes one