NCERT needs to get its lesson right on anthem
- Foreign Secretary Jaishankar visits China ahead of NSG plenary in Seoul
- Set of six logbooks Khan left with lawyer could hold key to Essar Tapes
- Was open (to second term), consulted govt... will return to academia: Rajan
- Tavleen Singh writes: Attitude of political Hindutva elements within BJP must change if it wants to win UP polls
- Across the aisle: Fake encounter with facts, fake controversy
The book, at the very outset, has the national anthem. Underneath the anthem, it says: ''Our national anthem, composed originally in Bangla by Rabindranath Tagore, was adopted in its Hindi version by the Constituent Assembly as the national anthem of India on January 24, 1950.''
On the contrary, minutes of the proceedings recorded on January 24, 1950, published in the Debates of Constituent Assembly, quotes Dr Rajendra Prasad, President of the Constituent Assembly: ''There is one matter that had been pending for discussion, namely the question of national anthem. At one time, it was thought that the matter might be brought up before the House and the decision taken by the House, by way of a resolution, but it has been felt that instead of taking a formal decision it is better if I make a statement with regard to the national anthem. Accordingly, I make this statement.''
It goes on to state: ''The composition, consisting of the words and music, known as Jana Gana Mana, is the national anthem of India, subject to such alteration in the words, as the government may authorise as occasion arises. And the song, Vande Mataram, which has played a historic part in the struggle for Indian freedom shall be honoured equally with Jana Gana Mana, and shall have equal status with it. I hope this will satisfy the members.''
NCERT's textbook development committee's member-coordinator, Prof Manju Jain of the Elementary Education department, had this excuse, ''These are preliminary pages, they are not the content of the book... so they are not meant for children. The publication department has put this, the textbook panel deals with the content. I'll get it checked.''
- No party aspires to radically transform UP. Each wants power for its own sake
- No one can declare that Ishrat, others were ‘terrorists’. That power belongs to the courts
- Indic religions don't believe that theirs the only God. This must not change
- The coaching industry wreaks an enormous social toll. What must be the policy response?
- There is an attempt to portray student activism as mere rabble-rousing
- Willingness to engage with ideas has to come from intellectuals, not political parties