New industrial policy unlikely to increase housing stock
- Nobody will be allowed to break India's unity, says Rajnath after Masarat's arrest
- Modi should behave like a PM, not an RSS 'pracharak': Congress
- Vehicles set ablaze in Kolkata suburb after death of councillor's brother
- Yechury says Modi's frequent foreign trips to make up for years of not being able to fly
- VIDEO: The only Indian civilian to have done aerobatics on a Sukhoi
The new industrial policy unveiled by the state government earmarking 40 per cent of land for special economic zones (SEZs) might not see substantial land being used for housing purposes in Pune district. While officers from the Maharshtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) admit that majority of the notified SEZs in Pune district will not have excess land to implement the schemes, realtors point out lack of basic civic infrastructure as one of the major hindrances in setting up affordable houses in SEZs.
The new industrial policy, which was approved by the state cabinet amongst other things, has set aside 40 per cent land for real estate development in SEZs. The policy states this would help in setting up special townships centered on major industrial zones and also help in de-congestion of cities. The policy, modalities of which are yet to be chalked out, has been welcomed by realtors across the state, especially in Mumbai and Nashik, where it would have unlocked large parcels of land in the SEZs.
As per the data on the website of the Special Economic Zones of India (Ministry of Industries and Commerce), Pune district has 15 SEZs on more than 1,400 hectares of land. Majority of these are in Haveli and Mulshi talukas of the district.
Ajit Relkar, regional officer (RO) of MIDC, Pune, said majority of SEZs in Pune are of relatively small land holdings with land ranging from 10- 30 hectares. "Bharat Forge's SEZ by far is the biggest SEZ in Pune spread over 1,000 hectares of notified land in Khed taluka," he said.
Relkar said the majority of construction and other work is complete in the SEZs. "The earmarking of 40 per cent of land for real estate would mean exiting from the SEZ and the question of compensation would arise," he said.