NGO plea against land acquisition annoys SC
- The gongs of Behmai: 35 years on, will justice be served?
- Mann Ki Baat: Start-up India to crop insurance, here's all that Modi said
- J-K crisis: Mehbooba to chair PDP meet, discuss govt formation
- MCD strike: Kejriwal supports demands of protesting employees
- Fifth Column: Hope PM Modi has realised that India is not Gujarat
The Supreme Court on Monday took exception to a petition filed by an NGO — Association for Protection of Democratic Rights (APDR) — regarding the Nano project in Singur.
The three-member Bench, headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan, took strong exception to the petition filed by the organisation, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan. However, it agreed to hear the case along with other petitions pending before it.
A visibly annoyed Bench made observations like, "It's a personal property right, how can an NGO challenge it," and "how can an association challenge a land allotment for public purpose?"
The advocate representing the association persisted and alleged that a separate procedure is required to be followed in cases where land is to be allotted to a company and in this case it was not followed.
Disagreeing with his submission initially, the Bench said, "We don't allow somebody else to file petitions on behalf of others." Questioning the locus standi of APDR for taking up the cause of farmers whose land was acquired by the state Government for Tata Motors' Nano project, the court was reluctant to hear the petition.
- China is not India’s sibling, nor is China India’s nemesis
- Bureaucrats are an obstacle in path of ‘parivartan’, ‘vikas’
- Out of my mind: Netaji will always remain a promise never fulfilled
- Reverse Swing: A Manifesto for Middle-Eastern Migrants in Europe
- Equality before law must be accompanied by equality in social practices
- Indian policymakers underestimate problems emanating from emerging economies