- His hands tied, PM surrendered to Sonia: ex-media adviserâs book
- How can Modi honour women if he canât mention his wife, asks Rahul
- Mewat simmers after poll clash, killing of Muslim youth
- After rare skull surgery at AIIMS, twins from Kerala look like each other
- Elections 2014 LIVE: FIR against Azam Khan; Rahul to file nomination papers today
On the Net, snark can trump depth. But bans are no solution.
Fed up of trolls derailing conversation on its boards, the online version of the venerable science magazine, Popular Science, has officially turned off its comments section. It has cited research that concludes that the general musings of pot-stirrers and spambots adversely affect reader comprehension. Comment sections are particularly unsuited to science articles, the argument goes, as they polarise opinion and reduce understanding of the issues under discussion.
But one of the great advantages of digital publishing is the immediacy and interactivity created between writer and reader. Instead of curated and edited letters' sections in print, which can only address a handful of articles, the internet affords readers the opportunity to engage with writers and each other on any number of issues at length. Comment threads can add perspective to articles and foster a sense of community. It is not unheard of for erudite commentators to receive offers to contribute to the websites they frequent.
- Under attack over rape remark, SP chief Mulayam Yadav blames media
- JD(S) releases manifesto, vows to protect interests of state
- Ambareesh returns, says will sort ‘minor differences’
- Sagar Ghosh killing: Breather for DGP as HC stays single bench order
- Face of Gujarat riots is face of BJP: Mamata
- Cong seeks action against Advani on ‘wrong’ info in affidavit