Now, Hindu Mahasabha to file plea in apex court tomorrow

The Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha has decided to move the Supreme Court challenging the Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ayodhya title suits, contending that the entire disputed site should be given to Hindus.

The Mahasabha will submit that the High Court had erred in directing that the disputed land be divided into three parts among Muslims, Hindus and Nirmohi Akhara.

"We will be filing an appeal in the Supreme Court on Monday and we will not sit idle till we get the entire disputed land for the construction of a magnificent Ram Temple there," Kamlesh Tiwari, member of the Mahasabha, told a press conference here.

The title dispute has already reached the Supreme Court with Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind and Sunni Wakf Board challenging the Allahabad High Court's verdict. The JUH had submitted in its appeal that the judgement is based on faith and not on evidence.

"It is humbly submitted that the mosque was illegally demolished. However, the ruins still exist. The foundation of the mosque is still intact. Title would not extinguish by demolishing the mosque," it said.

On September 30, a three-judge bench of the High Court had passed a majority verdict ruling that the disputed land should be divided into three equal parts to be given to the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and the parties representing 'Ram Lalla Virajman'.0

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus