Now, Kentucky Fried Chicken toxic?
- PM Modi breaks silence on Raghuram Rajan's reappointment, says it shouldn't be of media's interest
- Kejriwal, Nitish witnesses Mamata's oath-taking ceremony at Kolkata's Red Road
- US asks Pakistan to cooperate with India on 26/11 probe
- Even if we could benefit from polarisation, we wouldn’t want to derive such benefits: Rajnath Singh
- Opinion: Muslims and RSS cannot afford to go on hating
A Chinese supplier to popular US fast food chain KFC (Kentucky Fried Chicken - reportedly world's largest fried chicken chain) has been accused of lacing chicken feed with huge amounts of toxic additives to make chicken grow faster, media reports have said.
The reports emerged last week alleging that the Suhai Group adds toxic industrial chemicals to chicken feed to make the chicken grow faster --45 days for a chicken to grow big enough for slaughter.
Reports said that the chicken feed Suhai prepared was so toxic that it could even kill flies.
The Suhai Group, based in north China's Shanxi Province, said in a statement that its chicken meat "does not have problems" and samples are being sent to the provincial
quarantine agency for testing
Suhai countered that its production lines have passed the government's annual quality checks, and 45 days is a normal growth cycle for a chicken, state-run Xinhua news agency reported.
China's food industry has suffered a series of scandals in recent years, from melamine-laced dairy products to recycled "gutter oil".
The latest reports, though not yet verified, have sparked public fear.
According to Suhai's website, the company raises 120 million chickens annually.
It also says it is a supplier to major fast food chains like KFC, airlines and colleges across the country and exports to Saudi Arabia, Japan, the Republic of Korea and South Africa.
- Muslims and RSS cannot afford to go on hating
- After the initial euphoria, Modi government has created widespread despondency
- Fixing the learning deficit requires a lot more than right kind of tracking technology
- The problem begins with the way we define “urban” and “rural”
- Modi govt’s backward-looking instincts pulls down its forward-looking mission
- Judge-population ratio is not the apt parameter to determine judiciary’s strength