- India will set climate change conference agenda: Narendra Modi
- From Kerala family to ex-gangster, Islamic State pulls Maldives men
- Collegium system end: NJAC is in, judges lose say in hiring
- BJP-RSS set to demolish secular democratic foundations: CPI(M)
- Ahmedabad: Saffron uniform for Hindu kids, green for Muslim
In the clamour following the Delhi gangrape, it was clear that rape laws had to be revisited. The government appointed a three-member committee headed by Justice Verma to suggest changes to various laws on crimes against women. To put in effect some of the committee's recommendations, the government issued an ordinance last week. While the ordinance addresses most of the issues raised by the Verma committee, certain suggestions, like the criminalisation of marital rape, were not followed. Some of the ordinance's key provisions on sexual assault are discussed below.
First, the ordinance replaces the term rape with "sexual assault". Sexual assault is gender neutral, that is, it protects both men and women and may be perpetrated by men or women. While rape, under the IPC, implies penile penetration of the vagina, sexual assault, under the ordinance, has a broader definition. It implies the penetration of any orifice of the body by the penis or any other object. The ordinance therefore removes the requirement for proof of penetration. It also increases the minimum punishment for gangrape from 10 years to 20 years.
Second, prior to the ordinance, the IPC criminalised offences against the modesty of women. In addition to making them gender neutral, the ordinance increases the punishment for these offences. This is achieved by criminalising non-penetrative acts as "sexual harassment". These acts include physical contact, demands for sexual favours and forcibly showing pornography. They are punishable with up to five years' imprisonment. It is interesting to note that while the ordinance treats sexual harassment as gender neutral, sexual harassment at the workplace bill, pending in the Rajya Sabha, protects only women.
Third, rape resulting in death of the victim is tried as murder along with rape and has been considered fit for the death penalty in various cases. There is no specific provision under the IPC for rape that causes a persistent vegetative state. Such cases were punishable with imprisonment for a term prescribed for the offence of rape. The ordinance accepted the Verma committee's suggestion to punish such offenders with imprisonment for 20 years up to imprisonment for the rest of the offender's natural life. However, the ordinance also provides for death penalty for the offence.