Overreading the turnout
- Ahead of PM Modi's address to military commanders in Dehradun, EC warns against 'public meeting'
- No fake currency was seized from Nov 8 to Dec 30, Finance Ministry tells PAC
- On first day, Donald Trump signs health care executive order to 'ease burden of Obamacare'
- Way forward as Trump turns America inward
- Pakistan: 15 killed in blast at vegetable market, 30 injured
Higher turnout doesn't just reflect greater voter enthusiasm.
To begin with, a word of caution. Don't get surprised by, or read too much in, the high turnouts in the recently concluded assembly elections in five states. A higher turnout in the four states of Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Delhi (Mizoram witnessed a marginally lower turnout of 81.2 per cent in 2013, compared to 82.2 per cent in 2008), should not be read as a vote against the incumbent. If higher turnout necessarily meant a vote against the ruling party, the Nitish Kumar government in Bihar, Sheila Dikshit government in Delhi, Narendra Modi government in Gujarat, and Bhupinder Singh Hooda government in Haryana should not have been re-elected — recent assembly elections in these states witnessed a much higher turnout compared to previous assembly elections. Nor does a lower turnout inevitably mean a vote for the status quo, or in favour of the ruling government. In the recent past, there have been assembly elections where turnouts declined and the ruling party lost the election, as in Rajasthan (2008).
The higher turnouts in the recently concluded assembly elections are merely a continuation of the trend we have witnessed in most assembly elections held since 2003. This higher turnout is more a result of the better quality of electoral rolls, especially in urban constituencies, due to the weeding out of the names of ghost voters, and less a reflection of the actual increase in the number of voters who cast their vote.
Provisional figures released by the Election Commission indicate a nearly 4 per cent increase in turnout in Chhattisgarh (71 per cent in 2008, 75 per cent in 2013), an increase of about 3 per cent in Madhya Pradesh (69.6 per cent in 2008, 72 per cent in 2013), and a nearly 9 per cent increase in Rajasthan (66.5 per cent in 2008, 75 per cent in 2013). By all indications, the turnout in Delhi has also significantly overtaken the figure of 57.6 per cent in 2008.
- Now let’s try demonetisation without denouement, perpetually preserve the uncertainty
- A nation divided, and another seeking leadership of the supranational ummah
- Interests of national security demand urgent creation of overarching Ministry of Defence Technology & Industrial Production
- People's protest against inequality are producing govts that move exactly in opposite direction
- To deal with an unpredictable US, India will need to be more skilful
- Higher education in India is failing. Overhauling the system can salvage it