Pakistan: Tribunal rejects appeal of doctor who tracked bin Laden

Shakeel AfridiShakeel Afridi (Reuters)

A Pakistani tribunal rejected the appeal of Shakeel Afridi, the doctor arrested for helping the US track down al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, against his sentence.

The three-member Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) Tribunal, which includes Shah Waliullah, Akbar Khan and Pir Fida, has remanded the case to Commissioner, Frontier Crime Regulations.

In its judgment, the tribunal directed the Commissioner, FCR to review his verdict in the case and remove ambiguities.

Afridi had petitioned the FATA Tribunal in October seeking fresh trial with regard to the charges levelled against him, lifting of the ban on his bail and conducting the trial at the Central Prison in Peshawar.

The doctor, who was arrested immediately after the May 2, 2011 operation by US commandos that killed then al-Qaeda leader bin Laden, was convicted for treason over alleged ties to banned militant group Lashkar-e-Islam.

On August 29, a judicial official had overturned the 33-year jail sentence of Afridi, who was sentenced in May, 2012 on charges of colluding with Lashkar-e-Islam.

FCR Commissioner Sahibzada Mohammad Anees had ruled that a judge in the tribal belt had exceeded his authority when he handed down the sentence last year.

He had ordered a fresh trial and had said it would be heard by the Political Agent.

However, the doctor filed a seven-page revision petition in which he submitted that there was ambiguity in the order of FCR commissioner.

He approached the FATA Tribunal, an appellate court in FCR, to clear the ambiguity so that the political agent is directed to not only conduct fresh and fair trial in his case, but also remove the ban on his bail during the trial.

The petitioner had requested the tribunal to direct the political agent to make fresh order of reference and refer the case to a new jirga with the consent of the accused.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus