- Uri attack: Rajnath Singh, Manohar Parrikar, NSA, Army chief meet to discuss Kashmir
- Shahabuddin bail case: SC seeks RJD leader's reply, next hearing on Monday
- Uri attack: Will Sangh’s hardline stance influence India’s response?
- Uri terror attack: ‘Will avenge death of our soldiers... at a time of our choosing’
- Uri attack: Weapons recovered had Pakistan marking, initial probe indicates JeM role, says Army
What is it about time travel that so captures the cinematic imagination? Undoubtedly, a lot of the appeal of the film of temporal displacement, particularly in recent years, has to do with the "geek-out factor". The implications of moving back and forth in time stir the mind through their utter complexity. If a person goes back to a former moment in their life and meets their old self, what would happen? If an individual changes the events of the past, how will that alter the future? Musing on these imponderables and parsing the details of the systems that support them appeal to a certain human need to have our minds blown, but they also speak to a certain desire to obsess over the minute details of impossible operations.
A fascination with the forking paths of destiny is certainly nothing new (H.G. Wells's The Time Machine, for example, was published in 1895; Borges gave the idea a playful tweak some 70 years ago), but recent decades have seen a new fascination with popular culture artefacts that have fun with the symbiosis between past and present, whether it's American animated sitcoms — The Simpsons and Family Guy have both tackled the phenomenon, British pop music — The Fall's 1983 single 'Wings', or cinema. The latter offers filmmakers a chance to explore the possibilities of time travel, and the genre has given rise to a series of increasingly intricate mind-benders. Moving far beyond such relatively straightforward time-travellers as the Back to the Future trilogy (1985-1990), films like Shane Carruth's low budget Primer (2004) and Nacho Vigalondo's Timecrimes (2007) posited a much more intricately mapped relationship between past and present.
Vigalondo's film offers, in particular, an interesting example of the genre because, although it initially seems to be chiefly concerned with the "geek-out factor", it builds interesting moral implications into its convoluted, yet utterly clear, narrative. Timecrimes tells the story of a man who, glimpsing a naked woman through a nearby window, goes looking for the object of his voyeurism only to discover her dead body, a man with his head wrapped in a bloody bandage who stabs him in the arm, and a time machine that sends him back an hour and allows him to watch his former self repeat the actions he's just performed. Timecrimes invites the expected level of technical contemplation since, in time-travel movies of this level of intricacy, the elements rarely quite add up to anything whose coherence can withstand intense scrutiny. But not only does Vigalondo's film come pretty close, it also uses the act of voyeurism and a series of unexpected revelations to implicate both character and viewer in a moral quandary.
- Pakistan wages its proxy war against India with impunity
- The proposed surrogacy bill addresses major ethical concerns
- Muslim personal law has little Constitutional basis, so it cannot be challenged in law courts
- Zakir Naik’s appeal comes from mimicking the secular, modern world
- Prachanda’s pragmatic approach to bilateral relations is a good beginning
- Across the aisle: Why not try alternative approach?