PAU students go on indefinite strike
- Parliament LIVE: Expert committee to review use of pellet guns, says Rajnath
- Dalit fury spills over to Gujarat streets, 9 more try to end lives; CM meets family assaulted in Una
- Hit by campus protests, FTII makes new students sign ‘decorum, decency’ affidavit
- Dalits are 'soft target' for cow vigilantes: fact finding team
- Suspicious bag found inside Dubai-Amritsar SpiceJet flight
Students of BSc Agriculture Part1 (4 years course) and Part 3 (6 years course) at Punjab Agricultural University (PAU) have launched an indefinite strike on Monday over the university's decision to merge classes for both the courses. In addition to this, students of the Krishi Vigyan Kendra in Gurdaspur, who are part of the 6 year course, have been told to attend classes in Ludhiana due to shortage of teachers.
This has irked students, who say the decisions will increase class strength. Under the 6 year BSc course, students enroll themselves after Class X while in the 4 year course, the admission is after Class XII. Teachers, however, say that the syllabus for both course is similar to a certain extent and hence classes had been clubbed together.
Monday was to witness the first such class but students went on a strike stating that they will not be part of classes where student strength is more than 60. Parminder Singh Gujjar, president of the student union said: "Earlier we were about 35 students and now will exceed to more than 60. If the university is not having enough teachers, they should not admit more students. Already we are having shortage of rooms in hostels." The students also submitted their memorandums to dean academics and hostel wardens.
- UN faces a crisis, but its new secretary general is unlikely to upset tradition
- South China Sea verdict has changed the ground rules for future engagement with China
- Empowering women through JAM
- Resolution of citizen grievances is an indicator of the performance of government departments
- Telescope: Grace and the lack of it
- The endeavour for a common civil law must be to end discrimination, and not stamp majority might