PIL seeks human rights courts in all districts
- Elections 2014 LIVE: We talk less and work more, unlike the BJP who put a lot of money into marketing their poll campaigns, says Rahul Gandhi
- RBI: Growth rate to stay under 6 per cent
- Narendra Modi has deep character flaws... wouldâve fought in Varanasi if I knew Hindi: PC
- SC dismisses Centre's plea to review decision on Rajiv Gandhi killers
- US visa ban on Narendra Modi to be lifted if he becomes PM: Report
A Pune-based human rights activist has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) to set up Human Rights Courts in every district of the state. Asim Sarode, who has filed the PIL, which is up for hearing soon, says there are no such courts in the state though they are mandatory under Section 30 of the Human Rights Protection Act, 1993. The petition has department of Law and Judiciary as respondent.
"Even though there is mandatory provision in the Act for special human rights courts in every district, there are no such courts in the state so far,'' says Sarode.
He specifically states that the Law and Judiciary department had issued a notification directing to set up sessions courts as special human rights courts to deal with offences under the Act. A notification issued by the department directs to appoint special public prosecutor and additional public prosecutor to deal with cases. The PIL mentions that the government has shown insensitivity and reluctance in establishing human rights courts, in spite of directives.
Even as there were efforts by the legal intervention wing of the human rights body Sahyog Trust, of which Sarode is a member, besides other rights activists to request several district judges from Nagpur, Pune, Akola, Kolhapur and Jalgaon to set up human rights courts, there was no response, says Sarode. The PIL states that Section 30 of the Human Rights Protection Act, makes it mandatory to have such courts in every district and Section 31 states that the public prosecutor has to oversee administration of the said courts. Sarode states that till date no such efforts have been taken up.
The petition states that protecting individuals against state intrusion and giving scope to assert fundamental rights is the duty of the government.
- As campaigning picks up, candidates focus on strength areas of rivals
- 143 restaurants offer 30% discount to voters on April 30
- Auto union strike: Drivers demand Tricity permit
- RO serves Pawan Bansal show-cause notice
- BJP releases ‘chargesheet’ listing 16 Cong ‘scams’
- From mobile apps to post cards to call centres, parties go all out to woo voters