PM rejects BJP demand to put CBI chief appointment on hold
- Beef row: Amit Shah reprimands BJP 'motormouths' over controversial remarks
- NJAC SC verdict: Democracy cannot be 'tyranny of the unelected', says Arun Jaitley
- Rajkot police to file FIR against Hardik Patel for 'insulting' tricolour
- I am not Sheila Dikshit, will not let you sleep peacefully: Kejriwal to Modi on Delhi rapes
- After Express report on Pepsi displeasure, BCCI gets Vivo to sponsor IPL
The BJP Friday demanded that the appointment of the new CBI director be put on hold until Parliament passes the Lokpal Bill, but the Prime Minister rejected it saying the premier investigating agency cannot be left without a administrative head until the proposed law is enacted.
In a strongly-worded letter to BJP leaders Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said it was wrong to suggest that the current appointment or previous appointments to this post by his government were "motivated by collateral considerations".
"In view of the above, the question of keeping the new appointment in abeyance does not arise," he said.
The main opposition party had alleged that the government had rushed the appointment in order to "pre-empt" a "unanimous" recommendation made by the select committee on the Lokpal Bill to dilute the role of the government in the appointment process. The committee's report was tabled in Parliament on Friday, a day after the government announced that ITBP chief Ranjit Sinha, a Bihar cadre IPS officer, will be CBI chief after A P Singh retires on November 30.
"The manner in which the government has made this appointment hours before the tabling of this recommendation in the Rajya Sabha persuades us to the conclusion that the government wanted to pre-empt the possibility of this recommendation, at least in the present appointment," Swaraj and Jaitley had said in a letter to Singh in the morning.
"We must record our strong disappointment and disapproval of this act of the government," the letter said. "We would request you to revisit this matter and keep this appointment in abeyance till such time this recommendation becomes a law of the land. Hopefully, this can happen in the next few days."
Late in the evening, Singh wrote back, rejecting their "insinuation" and explaining why the appointment could not be held back.