Pooja Bhatt gets court relief in obscenity case
- With Air Force flypast, Republic Day parade concludes at Rajpath
- Republic Day celebrations pass off peacefully in Kashmir
- India, France talk tough on terror, stuck on Rafale price
- Continue to complain, rebel, demand, President Pranab Mukherjee tells nation
- Tamil Nadu suicides: College owner turns herself in
In a relief to producer and actor Pooja Bhatt, the Bombay High Court has quashed an order of a lower court to initiate criminal proceedings against her for alleged obscenity over the poster of her film 'Rog'.
Bhatt was charged for criminal conspiracy and under section 292 of the Indian Penal Code for public display or exhibition of obscene material.
Justice K U Chandiwal recently quashed the 2010 order of the sessions court directing initiation of criminal proceedings against Bhatt.
"Obscenity varies among moral standards of society and is linked to what a rational mind will interpret. The publication should be judged as a whole and photos need to be examined with responsible reader test," Justice Chandiwal observed.
The criminal proceedings against Bhatt were initiated based on a complaint made by activist Vinod Jain. Jain had compared the poster of 'Rog' to those of "blue" films.
In 2008, a metropolitan magistrate court had discharged Bhatt from the case after observing that there was not enough evidence against them.
But Jain challenged the order before the sessions court which set aside the magistrate's direction observing that the accused cannot be discharged at such an early stage.
Bhatt then approached the high court seeking for the criminal proceedings to be quashed and set aside.
Bhatt's lawyer Subodh Desai had argued that the publicity screening committee had thoroughly scrutinised all publicity material of its members' movies and had approved the posters.
Reacting to the order, Bhatt tweeted, "Divine Justice in the form of a high court hearing in my favor for an obscenity case against my film ROG. Fought this for 8 long years! Had I chickened out and settled out of court as most people in entertainment are prone to do, it would have resulted in more such cases."
- It is clear PM’s concept of nationhood extends beyond constitutional parameters
- Minority status for AMU?
- What we do with Parliament building will powerfully signify who we are, how we view our past, where we see ourselves going
- AIR’s decision to share its rich archives through an online radio station is welcome
- Asset sales are the way for govt to protect credibility while avoiding procyclical fiscal stance
- Who killed Rohith Vemula?