Prachanda keen on friendly ties with India
- Rafale deal is good, but bigger challenges for IAF remain
- Washington mall shooting: Lone gunman kills 4 in Cascade Mall, Burlington
- Uri attack could be reaction to 'atrocities' in Kashmir: Pak PM Nawaz Sharif
- No joint military exercise with Pakistan in PoK, Russia clarifies
Indicating a shift in his anti-India stand, former Nepal prime minister and chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Pushpa Kamal Dahal 'Prachanda' on Monday said that his party has moved away from the "narrow, feudal nationalism" to "progressive nationalism".
"We are not dogmatic or sectarian, we want to be progressive," he said at the Indian Council of World Affairs, a Ministry of External Affairs backed think-tank. He also held meetings with National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon and political leaders D P Tripathi (NCP), Sharad Yadav (JD-U), Rajnath Singh and Sushma Swaraj (BJP).
Prachanda will meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and External Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid on Tuesday.
Prachanda also pitched for a India-China-Nepal trilateral cooperation, saying that it is his "vision for the future", but added that it will "not undermine or replace the bilateral relations" between India and Nepal.
He said that a few months ago, his party, for the first time, talked about peaceful democratic politics and economic prosperity of Nepal. "Through progressive nationalism, we can create an atmosphere, and develop good relations with India. Without good understanding and relations with India, we cannot prosper," Prachanda said. Prachanda's last visited India as Nepal's PM in 2008.
- In both India and Pakistan, war and peace are used to make political gains
- PM Modi’s strategy of escalation vis a vis Pak seems like a gamble, but not without calculation.
- Describing soldiers who died in Uri as martyrs does them a disservice
- Claiming Shahabuddin is irrelevant in Nitish Kumar’s Bihar sidesteps the truth
- Pakistan and India must get together to isolate the Kashmir issue
- GST is reform long delayed, but there may be good reason not to hurry it through now