Private guards cannot hold arms without licence, SC told
- 'For 9 months, you have been sitting over names': SC raps Centre on appointment of judges
- Tata Group said to shortlist candidates for next chairman following ouster of Cyrus Mistry
- PM Modi to visit Japan in November, civil nuclear pact high on agenda
- J&K: After nearly 4 hours, Pakistan resumes mortar shelling in R S Pura sector
- Wanted to hit LeT camps in Pakistan after 26/11 strike: Shivshankar Menon
Asked to explain the regulatory framework for private security agencies and use of firearms by their security guards in the wake of the gunfight that led to the killing of liquor baron Gurdeep Singh Chadha alias Ponty and his brother Hardeep in November last year, the Centre on Monday told the Supreme Court that such guards do not have any special rights to hold firearms without licence.
Referring to the Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Act, 2005, and the rules there under, the Home ministry said possession and use of arms and ammunition were governed under the Arms Act and "private security guards don't have any special dispensation in so far as acquisition or holding weapons is concerned".
The MHA's affidavit, however, conceded that no separate guidelines had been issued under the Act for governing the use of firearms by private security guards and in cases of independent and illegal use of firearms, the guards and not their agencies shall be held liable.
The SC had in November 2012 taken suo motu cognizance of media reports on the involvement of armed private security guards in the Ponty Chadha murder case. Asking the MHA to explain different aspects of security agencies, the court had said that it would specifically want to know if these guards were "just mercenaries" or were authorised to open fire under defined circumstances.
Responding, the MHA has said that the PSARA provided for necessary regulatory framework and except for two states and one Union Territory, all others had notified the regulations under this law. A private security guard has been defined under the Act as a person who provides security with or without arms.
- A letter like Cyrus Mistry’s could deepen the credibility crisis of Indian capitalism
- The transgender rights bill dilutes the private member’s bill passed by Rajya Sabha
- Diverse myths around the festival underpin Hinduism’s openness
- Polygamy and gender justice debate is more complicated than it is made out to be
- By brokering for MNS, Devendra Fadnavis has shown himself as a CM afraid of a bully
- Pak PM would do well to study the past before choosing Raheel Sharif’s successor