Records given by police not readable: December 16 convicts tells HC

Delhi gangrapeThe court is hearing final arguments on the trial court's reference to it for confirmation of death sentences awarded to the four convicts. IE

Two of the four death row convicts in the December 16 gangrape case today claimed in the Delhi High Court that the Hindi translation of the judgement and other trial records given by the police are not readable and sought time to approach the Supreme Court on the issue.

A bench of Justices Reva Khetrapal and Pratibha Rani gave a week's time to convicts, Pawan Gupta and Mukesh Singh, to approach the apex court. The prosecution had supplied Hindi translations to the convicts on the direction of the Supreme Court in November after Pawan and Mukesh had approached it following High Court's refusal.

Special Public Prosecutor Dayan Krishnan, appearing for Delhi Police, however, opposed the defence's move today saying "as per the high court rule itself, death references should be heard on day-to-day basis in the interest of the convicts...".

"As per the Supreme Court direction, we have (police)

provided the translated copy to the defence counsel for each

of the convicts and also to the convicts at Tihar jail,"

Krishnan said. He said that the high court has asked them to file an objection, if they think it appropriate.

"He (the counsel for Pawan and Mukesh) did not make any objection. Now he needs one week more time...," the prosecutor said.

Krishnan also said that the defence counsel was just trying to stall the proceedings. However, advocate M L Sharma for Pawan and Mukesh opposed the prosecution's claim and said the police has not provided the proper translation of the documents.

"The translation is done through Google. Therefore, the

contents are not readable. It is not done in proper manner, so

I will go to the Supreme Court to take proper direction,"

Sharma said. During the proceedings, advocate A P Singh, appearing for convicts Akshay Thakur and Vinay Sharma, sought time to "interview his client" once again for the last time so that he can argue the appeal properly.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus