- Arvind Kejriwal calls 'emergency' Assembly session to discuss Centre's notification on Lt Governor's role
- Celebrations in AIADMK camp as Jayalalithaa becomes Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu
- No full statehood rights to Delhi unless there is consensus, says Arun Jaitley
- Gujjar protest to continue as talks with Rajasthan govt fail
- Heat wave toll in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana reaches 223
Deciding to set up a tariff authority is not enough. But it's a start
The Indian Railways (IR) had ground to a halt, in terms of both efficiency and safety, under the Trinamool Congress and its succession of railway ministers, from Mamata Banerjee to Mukul Roy. The decision to set up a Rail Tariff Authority was long overdue, given the imperative to de-link railway fares from populism — forever the bane of railway ministers. Railway Minister C.P. Joshi's announcement did not clarify whether the authority is going to be a regulatory or recommendatory body. Now that Banerjee no longer has IR in her grip, however, the Union government needs to move fast on it as one of the measures towards relief and rehabilitation.
Joshi could return to Dinesh Trivedi's reformist railway budget proposals, squelched by Banerjee's appointee Roy, and revisit the need to raise passenger fares, untouched for a decade. The Sam Pitroda- and Anil Kakodkar-headed high-level panels set up to advise on modernisation and safety had recommended both infusion of money from outside and fare hikes. The modernisation of IR, according to the Pitroda-led expert group, is said to require approximately Rs 5,60,000 crore over the next half-decade. Although Trivedi's 20 per cent hike in aam aadmi fares — rolled back by Roy — should ideally have been spread over a period of time, the fact remains that general-class passengers constitute 95 per cent of traffic, and time is not on IR's side. Another area requiring immediate attention is the operating (or cost-return) ratio, which Trivedi's budget had admitted was going to slip to 95 this year.