Reserve Bank disputes IMF view, says regulators act independently
- Arunachal crisis: SC to hear Congress plea against President's rule at 2 pm
- 6 years later, the admission — ‘Yes, I shot him dead, he was unarmed, officer told me to’
- India is doing great, nobody talks about it, says Donald Trump
- NFHS report reveals 50% children under five years anaemic in West Bengal
- Toyota sells 10.15 million vehicles in 2015, remains world's biggest automaker
The Reserve Bank of India has rejected the observations of the International Monetary Fund that Indian regulators 'lack de jure independence'. Instead, the RBI contended financial sector regulators in India operate independently within statutory frameworks and the "de facto position reveals no interference in the functioning of regulators."
The RBI, in its response to the joint study by IMF and World Bank on the 'Financial Sector Stability Assessment for India', said that India can't follow international group exposure norms as it would hamper economic growth. "Keeping the group borrower limit at the level of the single borrower limit would severely constrain the availability of bank finance, which would hamper the growth of the economy," the RBI said.
The IMF report that was released on Tuesday had said the RBI's regime for large exposures and connected lending should be tightened in line with international practice.
At present, the large exposure limit is a maximum of 55 per cent of a banking group's capital. It had identified areas for improvement including greater de jure independence of regulatory agencies, consolidated supervision of financial conglomerates, reductions in the large exposures and related-party lending limits in banks.
The IMF's report comes at a time when the apex bank is in the midst of issuing new bank permits and has also got enhanced supervisory powers with the passage of the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2011. It is part of the review of 25 systemically important economies under the Financial Stability Assessment Programme (FSAP).
While acknowledging the moral hazard posed by the appointment of an RBI officer as a nominee director on the banks' board, RBI said, "This system has served India well and ensured more effective compliance with RBI regulations from the banks' side. Nevertheless, RBI is sensitive to the issue and has taken up the matter with government of India for amendment of the enabling legal provisions."
- Dalit scholar’s death exposed inability of casteist Hindu to be modern
- Annotated edition of Hitler's Mein Kemph
- Why yuan matters Indian equity markets
- R-day and the saccharine sweet patriotism
- It is clear PM’s concept of nationhood extends beyond constitutional parameters
- The sensitive and old controversy about the minority character of AMU