Retrospective penalty, a farce
- J&K crisis: Governor asks PDP, BJP to clarify stand on govt formation
- Inexcusable: Delhi Police brutally assault student protesters outside RSS HQs
- Andhra quota stir takes violent turn, train set on fire
- MS Dhoni's 'great speech' to team after whitewash: ‘Don’t slip from here’
- Is Gujarat not part of India? SC questions failure in implementing MNREGA, Food Act
The fact that the drivers' title race almost reopened five days after Red Bull's Sebastian Vettel sealed it at the season-ending race was testament to how incredibly close 2012 was. And how utterly ridiculous FIA's rules can sometimes be.
Vettel's overtaking manoeuvre on Toro Rosso's Jean Eric Vergne during lap four of the Sao Paolo finale came under intense scrutiny on Thursday after a video footage suggested that the move might have been performed under yellow flags (therefore, illegal).
Egged on by Fernando Alonso, who finished second by just three points, Ferrari contemplated a protest. If proven, the infringement would've seen Vettel incurring a retrospective 20-second penalty, enough to surrender the title to the Spaniard.
However, FIA ruled that the move was legitimate and a major farce was averted. But why did it come to such a point in the first place? According to their guidelines: "If, in events forming part of an FIA championship, a new element is discovered... the period during which an appeal in review may be brought expires on November 30 of the year during which the decision that is liable to review has been handed down."
F1, with resources at their disposal, can do away with such ludicrous deadlines and therefore the possibility of a title being decided retrospectively. Imagine if there was indeed a rule breach, enforcing a penalty nearly a week after the race would have denied Vettel a fair chance of regaining his track position — which he could have done easily given that there were 67 laps more to go after the incident.
Even if he were to struggle — a bold assumption considering he is a great driver — Red Bull could have asked Mark Webber, who was ahead, to give Vettel a helping hand (slow down), just the way Felipe Massa did for his Ferrari teammate. The point is, with so many cameras and stewards, FIA's snail-paced decision making is horribly anachronistic. In F1, where split seconds make all the difference, five days is a lifetime.
- Ten years on, MGNREGA requires constant review. And consistency in political support
- The global economy is in trouble but India is attracting positive comment
- India’s expanding stakes in US demand a more strategic view of their changing politics
- Supreme Court has an opportunity to rectify its ruling on Section 377
- And everyone loves censorship — or so it seemed, at a session at the Jaipur Lit Fest
- The problem in Arunachal is as much about politics as about institutional norms