Right side of history
- His hands tied, PM surrendered to Sonia: ex-media adviserâs book
- How can Modi honour women if he canât mention his wife, asks Rahul
- Mewat simmers after poll clash, killing of Muslim youth
- After rare skull surgery at AIIMS, twins from Kerala look like each other
- For hate speech, EC orders UP not to let Amit Shah, Azam campaign
The long arc of history appears, finally, to be turning towards justice for same-sex couples in the UK. This week, the House of Commons voted in favour of legalising same-sex marriage by an overwhelming 225-vote margin, all but ensuring that the bill will become law, despite a revolt from more conservative Tory MPs. Marriage equality, as gay rights advocates refer to gay marriage now, is a progressive social measure whose time has come, and rather rapidly. Public opinion polls in the UK have reflected accelerating support for gay marriage — a March 2012 poll, for instance, showed that 45 per cent of voters supported gay marriage, which increased to 62 per cent by December.
It is no surprise, then, that several governments have responded to the fast-changing views of their electorate by legalising gay marriage. Last year, for instance, US President Barack Obama came out with his support for it and last month, referred to it in his inauguration address. His administration also decided not to uphold the Defence of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman. In November 2012, three states, Washington, Maine and Maryland, voted for legalisation of gay marriage. A similar consolidation of public opinion is visible in France and Germany, and the former has its own controversial marriage equality bill in parliament.
- Under attack over rape remark, SP chief Mulayam Yadav blames media
- JD(S) releases manifesto, vows to protect interests of state
- Ambareesh returns, says will sort ‘minor differences’
- Sagar Ghosh killing: Breather for DGP as HC stays single bench order
- Face of Gujarat riots is face of BJP: Mamata
- Cong seeks action against Advani on ‘wrong’ info in affidavit