Right-wing extremists had no hand in Dabholkar's murder:Police

Narendra DabholkarA reply by police today said that Dabholkar was not known to be facing any threat, so there was no question of police preparing any threat perception report (prior to the murder) and monitoring his activities, etc. PTI

Pune Police today told the Bombay High Court that there was no evidence suggesting involvement of right-wing extremists in the killing of anti-superstition activist Narendra Dabholkar.

Dabholkar, who spearheaded the anti-superstition movement in Maharashtra, was shot dead on August 20 in Pune; the police are as yet clueless about identity of the culprits.

A public interest litigation filed by former journalist Ketan Tirodkar has sought a probe by National Investigating Agency, alleging that Hindu right wing activists were involved.

A reply by police today said that Dabholkar was not known to be facing any threat, so there was no question of police preparing any threat perception report (prior to the murder) and monitoring his activities, etc.

More importantly, the contention that it was the handiwork of right wing extremists was based only on presumptions or petitioner's own imagination which is not

supported by any factual evidence, said Rajendra Bhamare, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Pune Crime Branch, in the affidavit filed before the court.

Police also handed over to the court two reports on investigation conducted so far in sealed covers to the division bench headed by Justice P V Hardas.

The judges did not open the covers today, and said they would peruse the reports at the next hearing, posted after two weeks.

ACP Bhamare also said the offence did not fall in the purview of National Investigation Agency Act, and the probe should not be transferred to the Central agency. "Our team is not under pressure from any political figure or any activist," the affidavit said.

NIA too had taken a similar stand when it told the court earlier that it cannot probe Dabholkar's murder as the offence fell under the Indian Penal Code, and was not covered by the NIA Act. Meanwhile, division bench of Justice M L Tahilyani today allowed withdrawal of a petition filed by Dr Dabholkar seeking to quash a complaint of criminal defamation against him and a subsequent summons issued by a Mumbai Magistrate.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views expressed in comments published on indianexpress.com are those of the comment writer's alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of The Indian Express Group or its staff. Comments are automatically posted live; however, indianexpress.com reserves the right to take it down at any time. We also reserve the right not to publish comments that are abusive, obscene, inflammatory, derogatory or defamatory.