Row over Delhi 6: HC quashes FIR against Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra
- Rajnath Singh does a Sonia Gandhi, meets top Shia clerics in Lucknow
- Gandhi vs Gandhi: Priyanka slams Varun, says LS poll not a family tea party
- Supreme Court grants recognition to transgenders as third category of sex
- SC rejects Kejriwal's plea to stay trial in defamation case filed by Kapil Sibal's son
- Modi equates Rahul with kids, says âtoffeeâ has caught his fancy after âballoonâ
The Delhi High Court today quashed an FIR, lodged against director Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra for allegedly depicting 'Valmiki' community in poor light in film Delhi-6, saying the Constitution "guarantees not only freedom of speech but also freedom after speech."
"A film (Delhi 6) that carries a message against a social evil cannot be made impermissible on the ground that it depicts the social evil. It has to be borne in mind that a film that illustrate consequences of social evil, must necessarily show that evil," Justice Manmohan said.
Screen Awards: Who was your favourite?
Keeping audiences in mind, Screen India came up with Popular Choice Awards in Best Actor and Best Actress categories.
"Consequently, the present petition is allowed and the FIR dated March 7, 2009 registered with Police Station Mandir Marg, under ... the Scheduled Castes and The Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act... read with Section 7(d) of the Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955 is quashed," the court said.
The FIR was lodged by Jai Kishan, an MLA from Sultanpuri in North West Delhi against Mehra alleging that film, starring Abhishek Bachchan, Sonam Kapoor as lead actors, had depicted a girl of Valmiki community in "derogatory" manner in the movie.
The court, in its 37-page verdict, said, "In fact, the certificate issued by CBFC furnishes a complete legal justification to the petitioner for public exhibition of the film and exonerates them from offences under IPC, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act as well as The Protection of Civil Rights Act."
Justice Manmohan, who also watched the movie during the hearing, said film Delhi-6 "being a piece of art" was entitled to protection under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution (which deals with freedom of speech and expression).
- Modi wave is a myth, says Siddaramaiah
- In Mandya, discordant notes in show of Cong unity
- ‘Fakir’ Jankar takes on Pawar might in battle against ‘dynasty’
- Ballot paper in Braille to help blind persons cast their vote
- AAP volunteer attacked
- 64-year-old fights for Punjabi language, gets little support from political parties