Salman Rushdie’s Civil Lines property split and sold years ago: Neighbours

Author set to get a huge sum even after losing court battle over his ancestral 4, Flagstaff Road bungalow

Salman Rushdie's ancestors owned three plots adjacent to the disputed bungalow — 4, Flagstaff Road in upscale Civil Lines — which the author's family lost after a protracted three-decade legal battle.

Neighbours of the bungalow revealed this on Sunday after the Supreme Court directed Rushdie and his family to honour a deed between his father Anis Ahmed Rushdie and then Congress leader Bhiku Ram Jain in December 1970.

Rushdie's father had entered into an agreement with Jain to sell the bungalow in North Delhi for Rs 3.75 lakh. Jain had paid

Rs 50,000 to Rushdie and given an assurance to pay the rest of the amount after the owner got tax clearance certificates from income tax authorities.

Later, the two families fought over agreement and accused each other of not respecting the terms. Jain filed a suit in 1977 requesting the trial court to direct Rushdie to honour the sales deed.

Finally, the Supreme Court ended the dispute by ruling in favour of the Jains.

The court also ruled that ends of justice would meet if a quietus is given to the dispute by directing the buyers to pay the current market price of the property instead of the initial sum agreed upon.

This means, Rushdie will get a huge sum of money, even after losing the case.

The Flagstaff Road neighbours said the Rushdie family owned a "huge plot". It was split and sold to four different parties in the 1960s and 70s.

The Kuckrejas own one of the plots — a part of which serves as a bed and breakfast facility. The second plot — 4B — changed hands several times before Bhiku Ram Jain's family bought it.

... contd.

Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus