SC orders trial court to deliver verdict in Kandhamal nun rape case
- BJP nominee to Modi critics: You will soon be in Pak, not India
- China says no to Arunachal youth in India delegation, Minister says letâs call off trip
- Upar Narendra, neeche Bhupinder... new BJP slogan echoes in states of rivals
- Lok sabha polls: Tamizh Talkies
- On Rahul campaign, Sonia tells Amethi: âLike Indira, I gave my son to youâ
The Supreme Court on Thursday ordered the trial court to deliver its verdict in a case involving rape of a Christian nun allegedly by religious fanatics during the 2008 Kandhamal riots in Orissa within three months while asserting that the courts must adopt a "belligerent approach instead of a wooden one."
The court had in February last year stayed the trial on a plea by the victim nun, who challenged the prosecution's failure to cross-examine a judicial magistrate, failure of which she claimed helped the accused persons. As per the victim, the magistrate had withheld some of the accusatory statements she had made against one of the accused person when he took the witness box.
A bench led by Justice S S Nijjar allowed the nun's appeal, argued through senior advocate Colin Gonsalves, and set aside the orders passed by the trial court and the high court. The lower courts had held that she had no right to seek recalling a witness for cross-examination and that she must have faith in justice delivery system.
The apex court however reproached the lower courts for a "casual approach" and said it would certainly cause a "serious miscarriage of justice" since the magistrate's version would influence the outcome of the case.
"We are convinced that the grievances as projected by the appellant as a victim, who was a victim of an offence of such a grotesque nature, in our considered view, the trial court as well as the High Court instead of rejecting the application of the appellant by simply making a reference to a CrPC provision in a blind folded manner," said the court.
The bench reminded the courts that "in criminal jurisprudence, while the offence is against the society, it is the unfortunate victim who is the actual sufferer and therefore, it is imperative for the State and the prosecution to ensure that no stone is left unturned. It is also the equal, if not more, the duty and responsibility of the Court to be alive and alert in the course of trial of a criminal case and ensure that the evidence recorded in accordance with law reflect every bit of vital information placed before it."